No Loans Against Gold and Silver, If You Miss These Details

In 2025, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) introduced a unified regulatory framework governing lending against gold and silver as collateral. The move is intended to address inconsistencies across lenders, raise the quality of collateral management, and protect both borrowers and financial institutions from undue risks. 

The revised rules bring in stricter norms on eligible collateral, loan-to-value limits, conduct standards, and disclosure requirements—all while carving out certain exemptions for small borrowers. This article explores the key changes, analyses their implications, and offers a balanced view of who stands to gain or lose under the new regime.

Evolution of Gold and Silver Lending in India

Historically, the regulatory guidelines for gold loans in India were scattered across multiple circulars and master directions issued over decades. Different rules applied to banks, non-bank financial companies (NBFCs), cooperative institutions, and rural lenders. This fragmented structure led to variable practices in collateral valuation, risk management, and borrower protection.

In recent years, the growth in gold-backed lending raised concerns for the central bank. Rapid increases in outstanding gold loans, combined with an uneven approach to risk assessment and collateral handling, generated supervisory apprehensions. To unify the regulatory approach and strengthen oversight, the RBI consolidated and harmonised norms via a flagship circular titled RBI (Lending Against Gold and Silver Collateral) Directions, 2025.

The new framework aims for a principle-based approach—requiring consistent standards across regulated entities, emphasizing risk controls, and ensuring borrower rights. It marks a significant inflection point in how lending against precious metals will be regulated going forward.

Key Features of the New Rules

The new guidelines cover a wide array of parameters: from eligibility of collateral to conduct rules, from LTV limits to loan classification. Below is a breakdown of the major changes:

Eligible Collateral and Prohibition on Certain Assets

Under the revamped rules, only certain forms of gold and silver can be accepted as collateral. Specifically:
 

• Loans can be secured by gold jewellery, gold ornaments, and approved gold/ silver coins.
   
• Gold bullion, ingots, bars (primary gold) or ETFs, mutual fund units backed by gold/silver are excluded.
   
• The rationale is that bullion and financial instruments tied to precious metals carry higher volatility and valuation complexity, making them riskier for lenders.
   

These restrictions guard against speculative pledging and make it easier for lenders to assess and manage collateral quality uniformly.

Loan-to-Value (LTV) Caps Based on Loan Size

To prevent overleveraging and reduce vulnerability in downturns, the RBI introduced tiered LTV ratios depending on the size of the loan. The idea is that smaller borrowers may get somewhat more favourable treatment. Here’s a summary:
 

Tiered LTV limits under the new RBI directions

Before this structure, many lenders used a uniform LTV cap (e.g. 75 %) or allowed more variation. The new approach is intended to balance access for smaller borrowers with prudence for larger loans. The introduction of these tiers underscores RBI’s intention to support credit flow at smaller levels while guarding systemic risk at higher levels.

In effect, the table’s caps mean that as loan size increases, the borrower must pledge more collateral (or accept a lower advance proportion) relative to the value of the gold/silver.

Loan Categories and Tenure Limits

The framework differentiates between consumption loans (for personal, non-income generating needs) and income-generating loans (for business, farming, or other productive purposes). Key provisions include:
 

• Bullet repayment consumption loans now have a ceiling: for cooperative banks and regional rural banks, such loans may not exceed ₹5 lakh per borrower.
   
• Tenure stretch: lenders must observe standard limits in aligning the duration and repayment schedule to borrower capacity.
   
• Renewals, top-ups are allowed only for non-stressed accounts and only if the existing LTV is not breached.
   

These constraints curb misuse and speculative refinancing of gold loans.

Conduct, Valuation, Custody and Disclosure Norms

To raise transparency and standardization, the RBI mandates:
 

• Uniform procedures across branches for weighing, purity checks, and valuation using prevailing market rates.
   
• Maintenance of robust collateral safekeeping—segregated vaults, insurance, and periodic audits.
   
• Strict prohibition on double pledging, the same collateral cannot be mortgaged to multiple lenders.
   
• Monitoring of end-use of funds: lenders must maintain documentary evidence and review whether the funds are being diverted.
   
• Mandatory disclosures to borrowers: interest, charges, default processes, and auction norms must be clearly communicated at sanction.
   

These measures aim to protect borrowers from predatory practices and reduce institutional risk from slippages or fraud.

Voluntary Pledging under Collateral-Free Regime

One contentious area was whether a borrower eligible for a collateral-free loan (e.g. in agriculture or MSME sector) could offer gold or silver as voluntary collateral without violating the “collateral-free” requirement. Under the updated guidance:
 

• Borrowers may voluntarily pledge gold/silver even when they qualify for collateral-free loans up to prescribed limits (e.g. ₹2 lakh for agricultural credit).
   
• Such pledging will not be considered a breach of the collateral-free lending rule — provided it is truly voluntary, with no coercion or mandate by the lender.
   

Thus, in select small-loan categories, borrowers retain flexibility to use their metal assets to secure more favourable terms if they wish, without losing regulatory privileges.

Who Gains, Who Faces Constraints?

The new regime has a mix of beneficiaries and those that may see tighter constraints. Below is a comparative view:
 

• Small Borrowers & Rural Households: The higher LTV (85 %) for loans up to ₹2.5 lakh, plus the voluntary pledge option under collateral-free norms, means better access and liquidity for smaller credit needs.
   
• MSMEs and Gold-intensive Businesses: The allowance for working-capital loans to enterprises using gold as raw material (beyond just jewellery firms) is a welcome expansion.
   
• Lenders (Banks, NBFCs, Cooperative Institutions): With uniform standards, clearer valuation and custody norms, and prohibition of risky collateral types, institution-level risk is reduced.
   
• Large Borrowers / High-value Gold Loans: They face stricter LTV ceilings, tighter conduct norms, and limitations on renewals, which constrains leverage.
   
• Entities Relying on Bullion/ETF Collateral: These are adversely impacted—they can no longer rely on bullion, gold ETFs, or mutual fund units backed by gold or silver as collateral.
   

Overall, the changes tilt the balance toward safer, more transparent lending practices, but come at the cost of reduced flexibility for high-value or speculative pledging.

Projected Impacts and Risks

While the rules aim to strengthen the system, their actual impact will depend on implementation and market responses.
 

• Credit Growth and Access: The relaxed norms for small-ticket loans could spur disbursement in rural and underserved areas.
   
• Risk Mitigation: Standardisation and stricter conduct norms may lower gold loan defaults or misvaluation errors.
   
• Pressure on Margins: Some lenders who depended on looser norms or riskier collateral may see margin compression.
   
• Operational Burden: Many lenders (especially small and cooperative ones) will need to upgrade systems — valuation tools, vault infrastructure, training, audit — to comply.
   
• Liquidity Stress: In a sharp gold price fall, the stricter LTVs and valuation rules may squeeze borrowers, increasing the risk of forced auctions.
   

These shifts suggest that while the direction is prudent, its success will depend heavily on regulatory vigilance and lender adaptation.

Conclusion

The RBI’s 2025 guidelines for lending against gold and silver mark a watershed in the governance of precious-metal backed credit in India. By unifying rules across financial institutions, enforcing clearer valuation and custody norms, and introducing tiered LTV limits, the framework seeks to bring greater transparency, fairness, and risk discipline to this space.

Small borrowers, particularly in rural and MSME segments, stand to gain from more favourable access and flexibility. Meanwhile, high-value loans and speculative pledging now face tighter constraints. The key test will lie in how lenders, particularly smaller ones, adapt to the new operational demands, and whether borrowers manage transitions without liquidity stress.

In sum, the new rules attempt a delicate balancing act: encouraging prudent credit flow while reducing systemic vulnerabilities. Their ultimate success will depend on consistent enforcement, technological upgrading by lenders, and adequate communication so that borrowers understand the new terms under which they engage in gold- and silver-backed borrowing.

Apply for Loans Fast and Hassle-Free

Apply Now

About the Author

LoansJagat Team

‘Simplify Finance for Everyone.’ This is the common goal of our team, as we try to explain any topic with relatable examples. From personal to business finance, managing EMIs to becoming debt-free, we do extensive research on each and every parameter, so you don’t have to. Scroll up and have a look at what 15+ years of experience in the BFSI sector looks like.