₹20,000 Crore Loans Given by IRFC; But Why?

In late September 2025, the Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC) made waves in markets by sanctioning three major loans totalling over ₹20,000 crore in just a couple of days. These financings span the power and fertiliser sectors and signal IRFC’s evolving role beyond pure railway asset leasing. This article examines the background, the details of these loans, their financial and strategic implications on IRFC, and what this might mean for investors and the broader Indian infrastructure financing landscape.

Background: IRFC’s Business Model and Recent Financial Trends

To appreciate the significance of these large loans, one must understand IRFC’s traditional mandate and its evolving positioning.

IRFC is the designated financing arm of Indian Railways, raising funds from domestic and international markets and deploying them to acquire rolling stock and rail infrastructure, which is then leased to the Indian Railways under lease or financing arrangements. (Screener) It is classified as a “systemically important” non-deposit taking NBFC and an infrastructure finance company. (Screener)

In recent years, IRFC has been expanding its lending footprint to entities with forward/backward linkages—particularly in energy, power, and related infrastructure—rather than limiting itself to rail assets.

Financially, IRFC’s revenues and profitability have grown steadily. In its Q3 FY25, revenue was relatively flat but net profit rose ~1.98 % year-on-year. (StockAnalysis) Its consolidated metrics show it carries a significant borrowing load (over ₹4 lakh crore in borrowings by 2025) to support its lease/lending operations. (Screener) The company trades at a P/E of ~23–24x. (StockAnalysis)

That said, IRFC’s expansion into large loan deals in heavy infrastructure marks a new chapter—and with it, both opportunities and risks.

Recent Loan Sanctions: The “₹20,000 Crore in Two Days” Story

The Three Loans: Overview and Purpose

Over two days (26–27 September 2025), IRFC announced three major financings, cumulatively exceeding ₹20,000 crore:
 

1. To CSPGCL (Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Ltd.) — A rupee term loan of ~₹12,640 crore for a 2×660 MW project at Raipur. (Moneycontrol)
    
2. To Talcher Fertilizers’ Coal Gasification Urea Project — ₹4,000 crore committed as part of a ₹12,250 crore debt package. (scanx.trade)
    
3. To PVUNL (Patratu Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd.) — ₹3,388.51 crore toward developing the Banhardih coal block (supplying coal to power plants) via a captive mining-rail linkage. (Screener)
    

These loans are meant to support energy, power generation, and fertiliser infrastructure, tying into India’s broader push for energy security, domestic fertiliser production, and reducing coal import dependence.

Table: Summary of the Three Major Loan Sanctions by IRFC

Below is a table summarising the key parameters of these financings. The table helps compare scale, recipient sectors, and strategic purpose.
 

Before you read the conclusions below, the above table offers a concise snapshot of how IRFC is deploying its capital into sectors beyond traditional rail financing.

Below is a brief synthesis of the themes emerging from the table:
 

• The magnitude of these loans is substantial, with the largest being nearly ₹12,640 crore, dwarfing typical lease financing to rolling stock.
   
• The sectors span thermal power, fertiliser (which has agricultural significance), and mining (coal supply chain) — pointing to diversified risk exposure.
   
• The strategic rationale ties to government priorities: power infrastructure expansion, self-reliance in fertilisers, and integrated mining-rail supply chains.
   

These deals show IRFC stepping more confidently into the infrastructure finance domain, leveraging its capital-raising strength and government backing.

Market Reaction & Share Price Impact

The market responded positively to the announcements. On 15 January 2025, when IRFC emerged as the lowest bidder for a ₹3,167 crore financing for PVUNL’s Banhardih coal block, its shares jumped ~4%. (Moneycontrol) More broadly, the news of ₹20,028.5 crore of loan sanctions was carried by Trendlyne as a key corporate development. (Trendlyne.com)

Given that IRFC is perceived as a PSU (public sector undertaking) with sovereign backing, such large, long-tenor infrastructure loans tend to support investor confidence—assuming due diligence, credit risk, and project execution remain manageable.

It is worth noting also that earlier in 2025, IRFC shares rallied ~6% after the government approved its raising of up to ₹10,000 crore via deep-discount bond instruments. (The Economic Times) This reflects investor appetite for diversified funding strategies aligned with growth.

Implications and Risks

Positive Implications
 

1. Diversification and Higher Margins
   These large infrastructure loans could fetch better spreads compared to traditional rail leasing, thereby enhancing IRFC’s profitability (if executed well).
    
2. Strategic Alignment with Government Priorities
   The loans align with India’s goals in power capacity, self-reliance in fertilisers, and energy security. That could amplify IRFC’s standing within government planning and facilitate further access to concessional funding.
    
3. Scale and Credibility in Infrastructure Finance
   IRFC is signaling its intent to become a bigger player in infrastructure lending. This could attract institutional investors and enhance its credit standing.
    
4. Potential for Cross-synergies
   Many of these financed projects have synergies with rail logistics (coal transport by rail), enabling IRFC to leverage its core domain in collateral or project delivery.
    

Key Risks and Challenges
 

1. Credit Risk & Project Execution Risk
   Unlike pure leasing to Indian Railways (where default is unlikely), financing large power/fertiliser firms involves counterparty risk, regulatory issues, fuel supply risk, environmental clearances, and execution delays.
    
2. Concentration Risk
   Deploying large sums into a few projects concentrates IRFC’s risk exposure. A default or underperformance in any of these could significantly strain its balance sheet.
    
3. Interest Rate / Funding Cost Risk
   IRFC borrows heavily to fund its operations. If interest rates rise or access to cheap funding becomes constrained, its net interest margins could be squeezed.
    
4. Regulatory / Policy Risk
   Infrastructure projects are subject to regulatory changes, environmental permissions, and state policies. Any adverse changes could impact project viability and loan servicing.
    
5. Capital Adequacy / Leverage Pressure
   Funding such large loans may require elevated borrowing or capital infusion. Maintaining credit ratings and leverage metrics will be important.
    

Long-Term Outlook & Investor Perspective

From an investor’s lens, IRFC’s pivot into large infrastructure lending is a bold bet. The returns could be attractive if IRFC successfully manages credit risk and scales up execution capabilities. However, the increased complexity demands more robust credit evaluation, monitoring, and risk mitigation.

Technical analysts interviewed by ET Now suggest that while IRFC has recovered from lower levels, it may enter a sideways consolidation phase between ₹130–₹150 unless it breaks out strongly. (ET Now) This indicates that the market may price in a cautious optimism at this juncture.

In the long run, if IRFC establishes a track record in infrastructure lending (beyond rail), it could evolve into a hybrid infrastructure finance institution with strong government moats. The success of these recent loans will set the tone for whether IRFC’s trajectory is incremental or transformational.

Conclusion

IRFC’s sanctioning of over ₹20,000 crore in loans across CSPGCL, Talcher fertilisers, and PVUNL in a short span reflects a decisive shift. From being the financial arm of Indian Railways to a more diversified infrastructure financier, IRFC is staking its claim in high-impact sectors. The scale and strategic alignment bolster its relevance, but the risks are nontrivial—credit, execution, regulatory, and leverage are all fronts that must be managed with prudence.

For investors, these moves spell opportunity if IRFC can translate these loans into clean, performing assets without distress. The coming quarters will be critical: lending performance, credit cost, and regulatory support will determine whether this is an astute evolution or a risky stretch. Ultimately, IRFC stands at a crossroads: it can either remain a niche rail financier or emerge as a leading infrastructure lending vehicle for India’s ambitious growth agenda.

Apply for Loans Fast and Hassle-Free

Apply Now

About the Author

LoansJagat Team

‘Simplify Finance for Everyone.’ This is the common goal of our team, as we try to explain any topic with relatable examples. From personal to business finance, managing EMIs to becoming debt-free, we do extensive research on each and every parameter, so you don’t have to. Scroll up and have a look at what 15+ years of experience in the BFSI sector looks like.